PrintPopular
March 13, 2010 | 10:20 am -
March 12, 2010 | 5:25 pm -
March 12, 2010 | 4:54 pm -
March 12, 2010 | 3:33 pm -
March 12, 2010 | 1:26 pm -
March 12, 2010 | 12:55 pm -
March 11, 2010 | 1:51 pm -
March 11, 2010 | 1:34 pm -
March 10, 2010 | 10:35 pm -
March 12, 2010 | 2:56 pm -
March 9, 2010 | 6:07 pm -
March 9, 2010 | 2:11 pm -
March 12, 2010 | 11:52 am -
Iran Has Finally Found its Nelson Mandela
get the magazine
Intellectual rigor. Honest reporting. Influential analysis. Don't miss another issue of the magazine considered "required reading" by the world's top decision-makers. Subscribe today.
COMMENTS (4)
I don't see anything wrong with that statement. The government (as in Obama's gov't) is looking to gut Medicare and convert everyone to this idiotic national healthcare system.
While we're cherry-picking on the topic of nitwits - how about the leftist retard who criticized Cheney for giving to charity, cursing him for saving taxes with one of the many "loopholes" wealthy people have. I don't think I need to explain the idiocy of that to any of you. Or do I? I don't have a high opinion on the intelligence of poli-sci or other soft subject types. Econ major rejects. That's what they are.
I don't see anything wrong with that statement. The government (as in Obama's gov't) is looking to gut Medicare and convert everyone to this idiotic national healthcare system.
While we're cherry-picking on the topic of nitwits - how about the leftist retard who criticized Cheney for giving to charity, cursing him for saving taxes with one of the many "loopholes" wealthy people have. I don't think I need to explain the idiocy of that to any of you. Or do I? I don't have a high opinion on the intelligence of poli-sci or other soft subject types. Econ major rejects. That's what they are.
I don't see anything wrong with your statement either, jwl2672 (can I just call you jwl for short? I'm MoSo to my friends).
Glad you clarified that "the government" was Obama's government - not that other, righteous, government-in-exile that Cheney and co can lead, De Gaulle style, until the vile communist traitors are driven out.
I also don't see anything wrong with your agreeing with the statement, then making clear that it was made by a nitwit.
Don't see anything wrong at all.
I don't see anything wrong with your statement either, jwl2672 (can I just call you jwl for short? I'm MoSo to my friends).
Glad you clarified that "the government" was Obama's government - not that other, righteous, government-in-exile that Cheney and co can lead, De Gaulle style, until the vile communist traitors are driven out.
I also don't see anything wrong with your agreeing with the statement, then making clear that it was made by a nitwit.
Don't see anything wrong at all.
Did some old man stand up and say the same thing at some town hall meeting?
Did some old man stand up and say the same thing at some town hall meeting?
Re: old man - yes, in South Carolina.
Re: Medicare - first, it's not going to gut Medicare, and second, Medicare is, in fact, a national healthcare program. It's just one that currently gives all those glorious, wonderful private insurers a dramatic incentive for withholding treatments that help people live healthier lives beyond age 65. After age 65, you're the government's problem, *not* the insurers - so insurers have zero incentive for providing you with longer-term treatments.
Econ flunkies, indeed.
Re: old man - yes, in South Carolina.
Re: Medicare - first, it's not going to gut Medicare, and second, Medicare is, in fact, a national healthcare program. It's just one that currently gives all those glorious, wonderful private insurers a dramatic incentive for withholding treatments that help people live healthier lives beyond age 65. After age 65, you're the government's problem, *not* the insurers - so insurers have zero incentive for providing you with longer-term treatments.
Econ flunkies, indeed.