Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
TNR on Sarah Palin
get the magazine
Intellectual rigor. Honest reporting. Influential analysis. Don't miss another issue of the magazine considered "required reading" by the world's top decision-makers. Subscribe today.
Democracy Corps has a very interesting survey about the worldview of conservative Republicans. The focus group interviews show that the Republican right, which consists of about a fifth of the electorate, is held together by a set of beliefs that goes well beyond small government and traditional values. "Our groups showed that they explicitly believe [Obama] is purposely and ruthlessly executing a hidden agenda to weaken and ultimately destroy the foundations of our country," reports the survey. Conservatives further believe that Obama’s policies are not merely misguided but "purposely designed to fail."
Conservatives pundits tend to be extremely touchy about the subject of right-wing paranoia. In response to a typically measured column by E.J. Dionne early this week ("Middle-income men, especially those who are not college graduates, have borne the brunt of economic change bred by both globalization and technological transformation," he sensibly observed), George W. Bush’s former minister of propaganda, Peter Wehner, exploded at Dionne’s "condescension." Wehner lashed back:
"[D]uring virtually the entire tenure of Obama’s predecessor, E.J. was part of a group, Angry White Men Inc., whose membership included the likes of Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews, Frank Rich, Paul Krugman, Jonathan Alter, Jonathan Chait, Bill Maher, Michael Moore, and many others. This homogenous crew was, to a person, afflicted with a condition diagnosed as Bush Derangement Syndrome, one that has effects on its victims long after the cause of the condition has left the stage."
Of course, the group mentioned above is not "homogenous" in any rational sense of the word. (It lumps together, among other splits, supporters of the Iraq war with Michael Moore!) The only homogeneity is a strong disapproval of George W. Bush’s presidency. To Wehner, of course, this remains the one salient fact. Wehner is still trying to use the propaganda technique from 2003, acting as if the only people who think Bush did a horrible job as president are wild-eyed left-wing radicals who suffer from some unusual derangement. In reality, by the last few years of the Bush administration, more than half the public strongly disapproved of Bush as president. If "Bush Derangement Syndrome" existed, it afflicted most of America. Those Americans still convinced of Bush’s brilliance long ago dwindled to a tiny remnant. Perhaps they represent the small hardy few who were able to resist B.D.S., but Wehner really ought to stop speaking from the perspective of the majority.
Wehner, hilariously, sneers, "Very few columnists have a degree in psychology. E.J. Dionne is not one of them. He should therefore leave the psychological explanations to others who are better equipped to deal with such matters." This was two paragraphs after diagnosing numerous figures with Bush Derangement Syndrome!
The most interesting conclusion from the Democracy Corps survey is the degree to which the GOP conservative worldview stands completely apart from the rest of America. Conservatives do not have a slightly more radical version of the same beliefs as other Americans. They have a completely sealed-off belief system. Even the most right-leaning independents find the right-wing worldview, with its conspiracies and persecution complex, unrecognizable:
"By comparison, the independent voters expressed clear concerns about Obama – especially that he is doing 'too much, too fast,' that he is spending too much, that they do not understand his health care reforms, and that he does not have a clear plan for bringing jobs back to the US – some of which certainly touched on the conservative Republicans' concerns. But they still fundamentally like and respect him on several levels and are very clearly rooting for him to succeed. …
The Republican base voters are not part of the continuum leading to the center of the electorate: they truly stand apart. For additional perspective, Democracy Corps conducted a parallel set of groups in suburban Cleveland. These groups, comprised of older, white, non-college independents and weak partisans, represent some of the most conservative swing voters in the electorate, and they demonstrated a wholly different worldview from Republican base voters by dismissing the fear of "socialism" and evaluating Obama in very different terms."
Conservatives, giddy at rising public discontent, have repeatedly portrayed a public somehow "waking up" to the reality of Obama that they have seen to clearly all along. But the right remains fundamentally as isolated today as it was in the final dying spasms of the Bush cult.
Intellectual rigor. Honest reporting. Influential analysis. Don't miss another issue of the magazine considered "required reading" by the world's top decision-makers. Subscribe today.
COMMENTS (4)
Here's BeckWorld's best kept secret.
They'll either repeat or not repeat 1994 [in 2010] depending on the extent to which they can convince the unemployed, barely hanging on by the skin of their teeth Archie Bunker Democrats that the Republican Party will actually improve their lot in life and bring the crumbs trickling back down to them by embracing the global economy all the more.
Oh, and "taking our country back again".
But what they are really counting on of course is that Obama and the folks on his economic team continue to show their utter disdain for all the bitter peckerwoods out on Main Street by letting Wall Street run the economy again as though the last couple of years had never even ... view full comment
Here's BeckWorld's best kept secret.
They'll either repeat or not repeat 1994 [in 2010] depending on the extent to which they can convince the unemployed, barely hanging on by the skin of their teeth Archie Bunker Democrats that the Republican Party will actually improve their lot in life and bring the crumbs trickling back down to them by embracing the global economy all the more.
Oh, and "taking our country back again".
But what they are really counting on of course is that Obama and the folks on his economic team continue to show their utter disdain for all the bitter peckerwoods out on Main Street by letting Wall Street run the economy again as though the last couple of years had never even happened.
Why should working men and women not see Obama for what he is: A pointy-head liberal intellectual who had long, long, long ago lost touch with the America he allegedly campaigned for? Obama, "community activist?" You have to go all the way back to the age of the dinosaurs for video of that particular salt of the earth. Extinct doesn't even come close to describing it today.
Admittedly, I don't know what Obama thinks about all this deep down inside his heart of heart. And maybe he does have a long term plan to, uh, change things audaciously. But why in the world would large swaths of Americans today vote for his party after the flagrant class warfare sham that was TARPWorld and [now] health care "reform"?
Above all, let's stop this "liberal" bullshit about how BeckWorld is winning the hearts and minds of Main Street with lies about socialism---instead of how Obama and the Democrats are losing them with their BushWorld lite contempt for the great unwashed and the deeper than ever pockets for the ever more cultured and sophisticated folks on Wall Street.
Birds of a feather not only flock together they reproduce together too.
george walton
j
Roll on, GOP in 2012!
Roll on, GOP in 2012!
Or, to expand a bit, roll on the GOP hopefuls who have to appease that particular camp before they can move on and try to argue that they are the "center." It's exactly this problem that turned a bunch of otherwise intelligent human beings at the Republican primary debates into leap-frogging idiots, each wanting to pander more to the obsessions of the audience, claiming that they didn't "believe in" evolution and asserting that they would "double the size" of Gitmo (the last one was Romney).
I'm waiting for the debate when they compete with each other over how to dismantle the popular and successful Obama health care reforms.
Or, to expand a bit, roll on the GOP hopefuls who have to appease that particular camp before they can move on and try to argue that they are the "center." It's exactly this problem that turned a bunch of otherwise intelligent human beings at the Republican primary debates into leap-frogging idiots, each wanting to pander more to the obsessions of the audience, claiming that they didn't "believe in" evolution and asserting that they would "double the size" of Gitmo (the last one was Romney).
I'm waiting for the debate when they compete with each other over how to dismantle the popular and successful Obama health care reforms.
Roll on, indeed.
Sadly, what all too many Democrats out in the hoods still don't get is that they voted the Republicans into office in both 2006 and 2008. Oh, sure, you can still count on the Dems to distance themselves from the Reps on most social policies---give or take, say, gun control and the death penalty---but when the bundling of Benjamins is the whole point of the policy you can scarcely tell them apart---give or take the occasional Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich and Alan Grayson.
It's all really rather pathetic now though. Back in the 60s and the 70s the left used to play this game with "the masses". The idea was that sooner or later...when things really got bad enough...they'd see ... view full comment
Roll on, indeed.
Sadly, what all too many Democrats out in the hoods still don't get is that they voted the Republicans into office in both 2006 and 2008. Oh, sure, you can still count on the Dems to distance themselves from the Reps on most social policies---give or take, say, gun control and the death penalty---but when the bundling of Benjamins is the whole point of the policy you can scarcely tell them apart---give or take the occasional Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich and Alan Grayson.
It's all really rather pathetic now though. Back in the 60s and the 70s the left used to play this game with "the masses". The idea was that sooner or later...when things really got bad enough...they'd see through this Republicrat scam and form a brand new party. Their own party. So they did their damnedest of course to make things worse. Or at least to pray things would get that way. The whole rationale behind the SLA, Weathermen wackos was the frustration that "the people" just weren't moving fast enough.
Really, a lot of leftists thought like this about "the revolution"! Indeed, so did I. For about 20 minutes.
Snort, snort, I know.
There is almost no possibility...far out into the present future...of this tag team match ever breaking down. It's the best of all possible worlds, isn't it? And for now [to rub salt into the wounded illusions of the left] the only thing standing between us and BeckWorld may well BE this brotherhood of the revolving doors!!
george walton
j