What About Afghan Women?

Ben Smith notes a striking omission from Obama's speech tonight: Although Obama spoke about America's dedication to human rights generally, there was no mention of the terrible plight of Afghan women specifically.

Curiously, however, his March 27 AfPak speech did include such a reference:

As their ranks dwindle, an enemy that has nothing to offer the Afghan people but terror and repression must be further isolated. And we will continue to support the basic human rights of all Afghans – including women and girls.

It's a sign of the extreme realism reigning in Washington today. Still, I find myself wondering whether a President Hillary Clinton would be pressing this case harder.

COMMENTS (5)

12/01/2009 - 11:39pm EDT |

Compared to other sites/blogs/ whatever, the immediate coverage here of Obama's big war speech is pathetic.

12/02/2009 - 4:13am EDT |

What's to cover, basman? Everyone has known everything about this policy adjustment for weeks.

As far as what President Hillary would have done, I shudder to think. Suffice to say that how Afghans have traditionally treated their womenfolk hardly amounts to a vital national interest, much less a causus belli.

12/02/2009 - 7:39am EDT |

I don't shudder to think what President Hillary would have done about Afghan women's rights. Thanks to the profligate adventurism of the Bush years, any American president would face extraordinary material constraints on the use of American force even where American forces are already deployed. Basically anyone in the world who would defy the president's wishes has only to ask, "You and what army?" and go about his business without worry. The 56,000 deployable troops left in our reserve are barely enough to cover Obama's minimalist escalation; they are far too few for any president even to consider pursuing the broader reform of Afghan society.

12/02/2009 - 11:48am EDT |

"Pursuing broader reform of Afghan society" would be, imho, a fool's errand no matter how many troops we have.

And, per Obama during the campaign, we are going to be adding about 96,000 new infantry troops to the Army and Marine establishments going forward. I doubt they'll be used to reinforce our garrison in Germany...

12/02/2009 - 3:04pm EDT |

...What's to cover, basman? Everyone has known everything about this policy adjustment for weeks....

Ahhh Powell, would that I had your sophisticated prescience. Me. I was all a'naive twitter after his speech and found the sites and blogs bursting, including live streaming. Not here though, even though there is at TNR an abiding division between considered opinion and on the spot commentary ranging from Oprah to securitized derivatives to what all.

get the magazine

Intellectual rigor. Honest reporting. Influential analysis. Don't miss another issue of the magazine considered "required reading" by the world's top decision-makers. Subscribe today.

Get our newsletters

Get Our Feed