Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
get the magazine
Intellectual rigor. Honest reporting. Influential analysis. Don't miss another issue of the magazine considered "required reading" by the world's top decision-makers. Subscribe today.
Federal student loans are one of the most clear-cut good versus evil issues you can find. Basically, the program has two ways of handling loans. One is for the government to make loans to college students. The other is for the government to pay private lenders to lend to students. The second method is more expensive and highly prone to corruption.
The Obama administration proposes to cut out the private loans and save over $80 billion over the next decade. Naturally, the lenders have mounted a huge counterassault on Capitol Hill. One of their tools is buying up Democrats to advocate their indefensible subsidy. Here's Jamie Gorelick, who was almost Attorney General:
“I would think that the White House would prefer not to make senators vote for something that is going to be very unpopular in their states — and for good reason,” said Jamie Gorelick, a former Clinton administration official who is now lobbying for the lending industry.
Cross Gorelick off the list of Democrats suitable to hold office. What a corrupt hack.
Intellectual rigor. Honest reporting. Influential analysis. Don't miss another issue of the magazine considered "required reading" by the world's top decision-makers. Subscribe today.
COMMENTS (12)
The race to the bottom. Our political system has been bought up, lock, stock, and barrel. Now we need only see how far our society descends before there is a social explosion of a revolutionary nature (that most likely precipitates violent right-wing repression and turns the US into a fascist or at least repressive, authoritarian state -- once the rich have all the power and all the money, they will not let go willingly). We are living the fall of the Roman Empire.
The race to the bottom. Our political system has been bought up, lock, stock, and barrel. Now we need only see how far our society descends before there is a social explosion of a revolutionary nature (that most likely precipitates violent right-wing repression and turns the US into a fascist or at least repressive, authoritarian state -- once the rich have all the power and all the money, they will not let go willingly). We are living the fall of the Roman Empire.
If you are crossing names off the list of Democrats suitable to hold office, why not include Gorelick's tutee, Eric Holder, the person who actually did become Attorney General. Everything Holder "knows" he learned while perched on Gorelick's lap. What a prize student!
If you are crossing names off the list of Democrats suitable to hold office, why not include Gorelick's tutee, Eric Holder, the person who actually did become Attorney General. Everything Holder "knows" he learned while perched on Gorelick's lap. What a prize student!
Nah. No guilt by association. You got complaints about Holder, make 'em about Holder and his words and deeds.
Nah. No guilt by association. You got complaints about Holder, make 'em about Holder and his words and deeds.
What, pray tell, was the good reason? Funny how the NYTimes didn't even follow up to what that reason is. And the only reason listed is that there might be more defaults without the banks dunning the students. Perhaps, but why would they care since the losses wouldn't be theirs? Obviously, they only care about their profits.
What, pray tell, was the good reason? Funny how the NYTimes didn't even follow up to what that reason is. And the only reason listed is that there might be more defaults without the banks dunning the students. Perhaps, but why would they care since the losses wouldn't be theirs? Obviously, they only care about their profits.
I have a solution, don't stop letting them lend the money, just take away the guarantee, let them eat the loss if the student defaults. If they claim they can do it better, then let them prove it by assuming the risk.
I have a solution, don't stop letting them lend the money, just take away the guarantee, let them eat the loss if the student defaults. If they claim they can do it better, then let them prove it by assuming the risk.
The thing is, blackton's plan already exists. Anyone can walk into a bank and apply for a personal loan to pay for tuition. Whether he gets the money is up to the bank and its tolerance for risk. And that's the way to frame this: lending through the banks amounts to a government bank bailout. Let the free market work without expensive government bailouts.
The thing is, blackton's plan already exists. Anyone can walk into a bank and apply for a personal loan to pay for tuition. Whether he gets the money is up to the bank and its tolerance for risk. And that's the way to frame this: lending through the banks amounts to a government bank bailout. Let the free market work without expensive government bailouts.
I don't see how Blackton's plan already exists, rhubs. The student loans are currently guaranteed by the feds, right?
I don't see how Blackton's plan already exists, rhubs. The student loans are currently guaranteed by the feds, right?
My political mantra since the banking crisis began: Big Money is Public Enemy Number One. Believe it. Just as Bush made lying in your face popular, so now with Big Money. They will have their profits no matter what and they don't care any longer who knows it.
Recently when I went into my local Bank of America branch to withdraw some money from my checking account, I was surprised to see so many employees dressed to be concierges, immediately offering personalized help to every walk-in customer. I felt like I was riding a conveyor of courtesy. "Well, that was certainly a nice change from usual" I told my partner, who looked a little bowled over by all the solicitousness. After I arrived home ... view full comment
My political mantra since the banking crisis began: Big Money is Public Enemy Number One. Believe it. Just as Bush made lying in your face popular, so now with Big Money. They will have their profits no matter what and they don't care any longer who knows it.
Recently when I went into my local Bank of America branch to withdraw some money from my checking account, I was surprised to see so many employees dressed to be concierges, immediately offering personalized help to every walk-in customer. I felt like I was riding a conveyor of courtesy. "Well, that was certainly a nice change from usual" I told my partner, who looked a little bowled over by all the solicitousness. After I arrived home from my errand, suddenly the dark thought came to me: "Sure, they're being nice to us. Soothing." My inner cynic repled "Anesthetizing, you mean."
Like roi, I believe the social revolution is coming. We can only be kept under so long before reality throttles us out of our torpor.
Like roi, I believe the social revolution is coming. We can only be kept under so long before reality throttles us out of our torpor.
rhub, what I meant is the government deposits the money in the banks for the express purpose of loaning it to the students (and for nothing else). It wouldn't come out of regular bank deposits. The banks then can't claim that the depositers money could be put to better use. The US gov't. could then earn the interest on the deposit and not assume the risk, the banks could then make the money from the loans higher rate and could then assume the risk of default. The banks will then compete with each other regarding rates and service. To be honest, I must prefer the Government do direct loans, but at least this is a compromise.
rhub, what I meant is the government deposits the money in the banks for the express purpose of loaning it to the students (and for nothing else). It wouldn't come out of regular bank deposits. The banks then can't claim that the depositers money could be put to better use. The US gov't. could then earn the interest on the deposit and not assume the risk, the banks could then make the money from the loans higher rate and could then assume the risk of default. The banks will then compete with each other regarding rates and service. To be honest, I must prefer the Government do direct loans, but at least this is a compromise.
Perhaps interesting brief reading despite all the political happy talk:
....About the Canada Student Loans Program (CSLP)
Mission
Program Overview
Organization
Mission
The mission of the Canada Student Loans Program (CSLP) is to promote accessibility to post-secondary education for students with a demonstrated financial need by lowering financial barriers through the provision of loans and grants, and to ensure Canadians have an opportunity to develop the knowledge and skills to participate in the economy and society.
Legislative Background
The Canada Student Loans Program was created in 1964 as a statutory spending program under the Canada Student Loans Act. This Act continues to ... view full comment
Perhaps interesting brief reading despite all the political happy talk:
....About the Canada Student Loans Program (CSLP)
Mission
Program Overview
Organization
Mission
The mission of the Canada Student Loans Program (CSLP) is to promote accessibility to post-secondary education for students with a demonstrated financial need by lowering financial barriers through the provision of loans and grants, and to ensure Canadians have an opportunity to develop the knowledge and skills to participate in the economy and society.
Legislative Background
The Canada Student Loans Program was created in 1964 as a statutory spending program under the Canada Student Loans Act. This Act continues to apply to loans negotiated prior to August 1, 1995. On June 23, 1994, the Canada Student Financial Assistance Act received Royal Assent. The new Act was needed to administer the risk-shared loan regime because the relationship between the federal government and financial institutions changed dramatically. In 2000, the Canada Student Financial Assistance Act was amended to allow for directly financed loans through the Government of Canada. Financial institutions are no longer responsible for issuing Canada Student Loans. Guaranteed student loans are governed pursuant to the Canada Student Loans Act, while risk-shared and directly financed student loans are governed pursuant to the Canada Student Financial Assistance Act.
Objectives
Maintaining the Government's Commitment to Accessibility - making student loans accessible to students with financial need by having policies, service delivery media, and information that maximize the accessibility of the program while maintaining program integrity.
Making the loan experience a positive one - by working to: simplify the program for all stakeholders; harmonize it with provincial/territorial programs and reduce defaults by improving services during the in-study period, repayment and collections.
Increasing awareness - by providing learning and labour market information to aid student borrowers and prospective borrowers in making informed choices. CSLP will continue to promote awareness by maintaining contact with borrowers throughout the life of the loan to improve borrower satisfaction and to enhance the loan repayment rate.
Ensuring performance, integrity and accountability - improving program results, reducing costs per student assisted, reducing defaults, and decreasing the percentage of loans written off by initiating a default management program; enhancing systems for tracking data; building accountability for reducing defaults into service provider contracts; and improving on-line services to students during the in-study period, during repayment and collections.
Program Overview
The Canada Student Loans Program (CSLP) is an essential element of the Government of Canada's Human Capital Agenda. Through the agenda, the Government is working to ensure that Canadians have the necessary skills to be able to compete in the economy of the 21st century. By providing loan monies to Canadians enrolled in full- or part-time post-secondary educational studies, the CSLP is able to offer individuals the opportunity to participate in the process of lifelong learning. The Government has assisted over 3.8 million students with over $28.1 billion in loans since the CSLP was founded.
The CSLP reflects a close federal-provincial-territorial relationship. Nine participating provinces and territories determine eligibility and assess students' financial need based on federal criteria, award the aid by issuing a loan certificate, and designate eligible educational institutions. Québec, the Northwest Territories, and Nunavut do not participate in the CSLP, but they offer their own Student Assistance Programs and receive alternative payments from the Government of Canada to assist in the operation of those programs.
History
The CSLP was created in 1964. Since its inception, the Program has supplemented the financial resources available to eligible students from other sources to assist in their pursuit of post-secondary education. Between 1964 and 1995, loans were provided by financial institutions to post-secondary students approved to receive financial assistance. The financial institutions also administered the loan repayment process. In return, the Government of Canada guaranteed each Canada Student Loan that was issued, by reimbursing the financial institution the full amount of loans that went into default.
In 1995, several important changes were made to the CSLP, reflecting the changing needs of the parties involved in the loan process. The Government of Canada developed a formalized "risk-shared" agreement with several financial institutions, whereby the institution would assume responsibility for the possible risk of defaulted loans in return for a fixed payment from the Government. During this period, the weekly federal loan amount was increased to a maximum of $165. This amount was increased to $210 as of August 1. 2005.
On July 31, 2000, the risk-shared arrangement between the Government of Canada and participating financial institutions came to an end. The Government of Canada now directly finances all new loans issued on or after August 1, 2000. The administration of Canada Student Loans has become the responsibility of the National Student Loans Service Centre (NSLSC). There are two divisions of the NSLSC, one to manage loans for students attending public institutions and the other to administer loans for students attending private institutions.
Integration
The Government of Canada has been working with participating provinces for a number of years to simplify student financial assistance in Canada. Since August 1, 2001, students in Ontario and Saskatchewan have been benefiting from integrated federal and provincial student loans. Subsequently since April 1, 2004, Newfoundland and Labrador now offer integrated loans and on May 1, 2005 New Brunswick signed an integration agreement with the Government of Canada. Since the Government of Canada and each of the provinces agreed to integrate their student loans programs, the result has been a more streamlined and simplified loan process for student borrowers.
With Integrated Student Loans, first time borrowers benefit from one application, one need assessment, one loan certificate and loan agreement form, and common repayment assistance measures. As a result, these borrowers have one student debt and make a single payment when repaying their student loans. Already, integrated certificates of eligibility are in use for borrowers residing in all integrated provinces. These borrowers also benefit from a single loan consolidation form and process and a single interest relief application for their integrated student loans.
Borrowers with student loans issued prior to August 1, 2001, also benefit from Integrated Student Loans in Ontario, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador and New Brunswick. It is important to remember, however, that they will maintain a separate consolidation and repayment process for their risk-shared and guaranteed loans.
For more information about the program, visit the Canada Student Loans Program section under Programs and Services....
Here's my complaint about Eric Holder: I keep confusing him with Eric Cantor. Not for any reason except a similar name, but it's still annoying.
Here's my complaint about Eric Holder: I keep confusing him with Eric Cantor. Not for any reason except a similar name, but it's still annoying.