Jamie Gorelick Better Hope There's No Afterlife

Federal student loans are one of the most clear-cut good versus evil issues you can find. Basically, the program has two ways of handling loans. One is for the government to make loans to college students. The other is for the government to pay private lenders to lend to students. The second method is more expensive and highly prone to corruption.

The Obama administration proposes to cut out the private loans and save over $80 billion over the next decade. Naturally, the lenders have mounted a huge counterassault on Capitol Hill. One of their tools is buying up Democrats to advocate their indefensible subsidy. Here's Jamie Gorelick, who was almost Attorney General:

“I would think that the White House would prefer not to make senators vote for something that is going to be very unpopular in their states — and for good reason,” said Jamie Gorelick, a former Clinton administration official who is now lobbying for the lending industry.

Cross Gorelick off the list of Democrats suitable to hold office. What a corrupt hack.

More Articles On: Clinton, Jamie Gorelick, White House

COMMENTS (12)

02/06/2010 - 2:48pm EDT |

The race to the bottom. Our political system has been bought up, lock, stock, and barrel. Now we need only see how far our society descends before there is a social explosion of a revolutionary nature (that most likely precipitates violent right-wing repression and turns the US into a fascist or at least repressive, authoritarian state -- once the rich have all the power and all the money, they will not let go willingly). We are living the fall of the Roman Empire.

02/06/2010 - 5:21pm EDT |

If you are crossing names off the list of Democrats suitable to hold office, why not include Gorelick's tutee, Eric Holder, the person who actually did become Attorney General. Everything Holder "knows" he learned while perched on Gorelick's lap. What a prize student!

02/06/2010 - 5:41pm EDT |

Nah. No guilt by association. You got complaints about Holder, make 'em about Holder and his words and deeds.

02/06/2010 - 6:22pm EDT |

What, pray tell, was the good reason? Funny how the NYTimes didn't even follow up to what that reason is. And the only reason listed is that there might be more defaults without the banks dunning the students. Perhaps, but why would they care since the losses wouldn't be theirs? Obviously, they only care about their profits.

02/06/2010 - 6:30pm EDT |

I have a solution, don't stop letting them lend the money, just take away the guarantee, let them eat the loss if the student defaults. If they claim they can do it better, then let them prove it by assuming the risk.

02/07/2010 - 9:54am EDT |

The thing is, blackton's plan already exists. Anyone can walk into a bank and apply for a personal loan to pay for tuition. Whether he gets the money is up to the bank and its tolerance for risk. And that's the way to frame this: lending through the banks amounts to a government bank bailout. Let the free market work without expensive government bailouts.

02/07/2010 - 12:45pm EDT |

I don't see how Blackton's plan already exists, rhubs. The student loans are currently guaranteed by the feds, right?

02/07/2010 - 1:31pm EDT |

My political mantra since the banking crisis began: Big Money is Public Enemy Number One. Believe it. Just as Bush made lying in your face popular, so now with Big Money. They will have their profits no matter what and they don't care any longer who knows it.

Recently when I went into my local Bank of America branch to withdraw some money from my checking account, I was surprised to see so many employees dressed to be concierges, immediately offering personalized help to every walk-in customer. I felt like I was riding a conveyor of courtesy. "Well, that was certainly a nice change from usual" I told my partner, who looked a little bowled over by all the solicitousness. After I arrived home ... view full comment

02/07/2010 - 1:34pm EDT |

Like roi, I believe the social revolution is coming. We can only be kept under so long before reality throttles us out of our torpor.

02/07/2010 - 4:05pm EDT |

rhub, what I meant is the government deposits the money in the banks for the express purpose of loaning it to the students (and for nothing else). It wouldn't come out of regular bank deposits. The banks then can't claim that the depositers money could be put to better use. The US gov't. could then earn the interest on the deposit and not assume the risk, the banks could then make the money from the loans higher rate and could then assume the risk of default. The banks will then compete with each other regarding rates and service. To be honest, I must prefer the Government do direct loans, but at least this is a compromise.

02/07/2010 - 5:08pm EDT |

Perhaps interesting brief reading despite all the political happy talk:

....About the Canada Student Loans Program (CSLP)

Mission

Program Overview

Organization

Mission

The mission of the Canada Student Loans Program (CSLP) is to promote accessibility to post-secondary education for students with a demonstrated financial need by lowering financial barriers through the provision of loans and grants, and to ensure Canadians have an opportunity to develop the knowledge and skills to participate in the economy and society.

Legislative Background

The Canada Student Loans Program was created in 1964 as a statutory spending program under the Canada Student Loans Act. This Act continues to ... view full comment

02/08/2010 - 10:51am EDT |

Here's my complaint about Eric Holder: I keep confusing him with Eric Cantor. Not for any reason except a similar name, but it's still annoying.

get the magazine

Intellectual rigor. Honest reporting. Influential analysis. Don't miss another issue of the magazine considered "required reading" by the world's top decision-makers. Subscribe today.

Get our newsletters

Get Our Feed