The Dirty Secret Of the Tax Cut Debate | The New Republic
Skip Navigation
Jonathan Chait/

The Dirty Secret Of the Tax Cut Debate

...is that neither side really wants the Bush middle class tax cuts. In 2001 Republicans really wanted to cut taxes for high-income earners, either out of a belief in the enormous sensitivity of high-income earners to marginal tax rates or a deep-seated moral opposition to the principle of progressive taxation. But in order to make those cuts salable, they paired them with tax cuts that also benefited middle-class taxpayers.

In 2004 and 2008, Democrats -- who objected to both the regressive effects of those tax cuts and the revenue-draining effects -- decided to tack to the middle by embracing the middle-class tax cuts and opposing only the cuts that benefit just the top 2%.

But the truth is that Democrats would rather just eliminate the whole thing and have the revenue. And Republicans think the middle-class tax cuts are economically useless. (AEI's Alan Viard, whose resume I accidentally inflated, makes the case against the middle-class tax cuts.) You can also see the thinking in retiring Republican Senator George Voinovich's opposition to extending any of the tax cuts, something you haven't seen from non-retiring GOP Senators.

So basically, neither side wants the middle-class tax cuts. Yet both sides are working to pose as champions of those tax cuts because they're extremely possible. One point of President Obama's post-election deficit commission is to create some way for both parties to agree to to claw back those tax cuts, in part or in whole, in such a way as to insulate both from blame.

In the meantime, the failure of Democrats to put Republicans on the spot by holding a straight vote on the middle-class tax cuts remains baffling. If you're going to compromise your preferences for political expedience, why not at least enjoy the political expedience? If Republicans block the bill, you can blame them both for raising taxes on the middle class out of deference to their rich buddies, which is true, while secretly enjoying the benefits of tax revenues sufficient to fund the federal government and stave off a financial crisis in a few years.

Read More:
Republican Party, George Voinovich, Jonathan Chait, Alan Viard
Logo

Independent journalism matters

×

Ads help fund our journalism. Please disable your ad blocker so that we can continue striving to be the most influential magazine in Washington, D.C., with our breaking news coverage, in-depth political features, and much more.

Continue without disabling

Choose your Ad Blocker

  • Adblock Plus
  • Adblock
  • Adguard
  • Ad Remover
  • Brave
  • Ghostery
  • uBlock Origin
  • uBlock
  • UltraBlock
  • Other
  1. In the extension bar, click the AdBlock Plus icon
  2. Click the large blue toggle for this website
  3. Click refresh
  1. In the extension bar, click the AdBlock icon
  2. Under "Pause on this site" click "Always"
  1. In the extension bar, click on the Adguard icon
  2. Click on the large green toggle for this website
  1. In the extension bar, click on the Ad Remover icon
  2. Click "Disable on This Website"
  1. In the extension bar, click on the orange lion icon
  2. Click the toggle on the top right, shifting from "Up" to "Down"
  1. In the extension bar, click on the Ghostery icon
  2. Click the "Anti-Tracking" shield so it says "Off"
  3. Click the "Ad-Blocking" stop sign so it says "Off"
  4. Refresh the page
  1. In the extension bar, click on the uBlock Origin icon
  2. Click on the big, blue power button
  3. Refresh the page
  1. In the extension bar, click on the uBlock icon
  2. Click on the big, blue power button
  3. Refresh the page
  1. In the extension bar, click on the UltraBlock icon
  2. Check the "Disable UltraBlock" checkbox
  1. Please disable your Ad Blocker
  2. Disable any DNS blocking tools such as AdGuardDNS or NextDNS

If the prompt is still appearing, please disable any tools or services you are using that block internet ads (e.g. DNS Servers).