Stocked Exchange

Did the Senate just kill a crucial ingredient of health care reform?

Ten years from now, if health care reform is a boondoggle, you might be able to trace that failure back to a decision in the wee hours of last week's Senate Finance Committee hearings.

It happened on Thursday night, just before midnight, when John Kerry put forward an amendment. It was amendment C-8: "Empowering State Exchanges to be Prudent Purchasers." The title may sound innocuous, if a bit arcane. But if you've followed the health care reform debate, then you know (or should know) that anything involving the insurance exchanges is important.

And Kerry's amendment is very important.

The idea of an insurance exchange is relatively straightforward. If you work for a big company or, say, the federal government, every year you choose from among a set of insurance plans--all of them conforming to some minimal standard, all of them available to you regardless of pre-existing medical condition. They've been chosen by your human resources or benefit department, who--ideally--have some clue about what they're doing, more at least than you do.

If, by contrast, you work on your own or in a small company, then you may have just one choice--or no choice at all. Affordable coverage probably won't be available to you if you have existing medical problems; even if you're healthy, the coverage you get could have major gaps or be otherwise unreliable. It'd be good to know which policies work and which ones don't. But unless you happen to be an actuary or insurance broker yourself, chances are you're clueless when it comes to navigating this complex world.

It's you, the individual or small businessperson trying to buy insurance, for whom the exchanges are being created. They're basically regulated marketplaces, where you get to choose from among insurance plans more or less the same way folks in large companies do. Your premiums should be more affordable, since now you're part of a large bargaining group. You should be able to get coverage regardless of preexisting conditions, since insurers can't pick and choose which exchange customers to cover. And you should have the peace of mind that the coverage is good, since you know it's been screened by the exchange.

The concept has been around for a while, although it's gone under different names. The reform plan that Bill Clinton put forward in 1993 proposed to create health "alliances" that would serve roughly the same purpose. And while that vision never came to fruition, one state, Massachusetts, managed to create such an institution three years ago, when--as part of a more comprehensive health reform plan--it started a pair of insurance pools for small businesses and individuals who couldn't get coverage through employers.

Page 1 of 2

COMMENTS (3)

10/05/2009 - 12:49am EDT |

"Did the Senate just kill a crucial ingredient of health care reform?"

george:

You mean after the part about "reform" itself? There's more to snuff out?

Complexity is the mother in law of all con games. It's always easier to stiff someone when you know a lot more than they do. Ever take your car into a transmission shop? Certain capitalists thrive on what the government allows them to get away with in dealing with "consumers".

Here's hoping though that Kerry can somehow get his pasties attached to the big fat teats of the insurance industry.

And he may actually have the best of intentions here because though he has garnered $1,340,000 from the insurance history over the course of his political c ... view full comment

10/05/2009 - 10:23pm EDT |

Jonathan: As you mention, the Kerry Amendment/C-8, SHOULD go thru, when the Conference Committee decides-on the final design of h-care reform. .. Just a question; does the Prudent Purchaser plan work very well, for EVERY State?

10/05/2009 - 11:41pm EDT |

Why would the administrators of the Exchange be likely to make good decisions about what insurance plans to offer? Choice of homeowner's insurance is not restricted in this way, whay should choices of health insurance be restricted by such a bureaucracy?

get the magazine

Intellectual rigor. Honest reporting. Influential analysis. Don't miss another issue of the magazine considered "required reading" by the world's top decision-makers. Subscribe today.

Get our newsletters

Get Our Feed