‘With Them or With Us’

The regime’s commemoration of the Iranian hostage crisis didn’t quite go according to plan.

Almost three decades ago, a group of radical Islamist students, dressed in army fatigues or covered in scarves and black chadors, forced their way into the American embassy in Tehran. According to some accounts, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, then a student at a second-tier technical college in Tehran, was invited to join the hostage takers. He declined, saying he would join only if they would also occupy the Soviet embassy in Tehran. “No to the West, No to the East” was in those days the much-touted slogan of the regime.

The students, we now know, initially planned their action as political theater, no more than a daring stunt. After a few days, and some publicity, they intended to end the occupation. Regime leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, however, had other ideas. Sensing the political gains of prolonging the crisis, he called the take-over of the embassy the Second Revolution and used it to consolidate his hold on power. Every year since, the regime has organized mass demonstrations to celebrate this brazen breach of diplomatic decorum as a way to bolster its own popularity.

Yesterday, the regime tried to repeat this ritual--but something else happened on the way to the embassy. From weeks before, sources close to the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) and the Basij declared their intention to make the day into a showdown with the opposition, a day the regime would bring out its forces in full. In the words of Sobhe-Sadeq, the political organ of the IRGC, the world would be forced to accept that “the people” are with the regime, and that the democratic opposition is nothing but a silly handful of effeminate upper-middle-class sissies.

But the rifts within the regime were on full display during yesterday’s ceremonies. Days earlier, Ahmadinejad had declared his “satisfaction” with the results of the negotiations with the United States in Geneva, and promised more direct contact. In response, Hossein Shariat-Madari, the infamous editor of the daily Keyhan--nowseen asthe semi-official voice of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei--wrote in a surprisingly sharp-tongued editorial that only Khamenei sets Iranian nuclear and foreign policy; the editorial went so far as to even deny there had ever been direct negotiations between the United States and Iran in Geneva. Leaving no doubt as to his true feelings, Khamenei began yesterday’s commemoration with a scathing attack on America. Obama has been all talk and no action, Khamenei said, and his talks and his smiles have been so transparently bereft of real substance that they would not even “fool a child.”

Before regime supporters and critics took to the streets yesterday, another key development took place. Ayatollah Hossein Montazeri, now clearly the spiritual father of the Green movement, issued a remarkable statement, apologizing for the fact that, 30 years ago, as one of the leaders of the clerical regime, he had supported the occupation of the American embassy. It was, Montazeri declared, a foolish, costly decision, tantamount to a declaration of war. He went on to lambaste the regime for now selling the country cheaply to China and Russia. What is the difference between Russia and America, he asked, and why is it acceptable to give the former all kinds of concessions, while refusing to even negotiate with the latter?

As the day wore on, it became clear that the regime’s attempt to intimidate people into silence or inaction had failed again. Regime critics showed up in impressive numbers. Hundreds were beaten by security forces, including opposition leaders Mir Hussein Moussavi and Mehdi Karubi.

Page 1 of 2

COMMENTS (4)

11/05/2009 - 2:59pm EDT |

Where's TE Lawrence when we need him?

11/05/2009 - 3:11pm EDT |

Really ... what would you have him do?

11/05/2009 - 4:02pm EDT |

Have sex with the Revolutionary Guards ...?

But seriously folks ... "this brazen breach of diplomatic decorum" - how about a violation of international law? The way Milani puts it, it's as if the students were eating green peas with spoons instead of forks.

I remember that day, though increasingly hazily. There was jubilation everywhere in the streets of Tehran: by the revolutionaries for the sheer brazenness of the violation; by the anti-revolutionaries (such as myself), for its brazen insanity, which we thought would bring swift retribution from the US and an ignominious end to the rule of the crazies. We had not counted on monumental incompetence in DC - after the Debacle in the Desert, ... view full comment

11/06/2009 - 11:21am EDT |

Thanks for that reality check, icarusr.

TBH, Obama just does not have any good options in Iran. Thanks to the CIA overthrowing Mossaddeq in 1953, the US can't actively support the opposition without discrediting it in the eyes of the Iranian people, and handing Khamenei a propaganda coup.

And with the nuclear issue, we need to make a good faith effort at negotiations. I don't think Iran will be anything but duplicitious over its nuclear programs, but that behavior needs to be seen for other nations to rally in opposition.

get the magazine

Intellectual rigor. Honest reporting. Influential analysis. Don't miss another issue of the magazine considered "required reading" by the world's top decision-makers. Subscribe today.

Get our newsletters

Get Our Feed